Fleet Operations Excelsior 2 Community Design - Mods
Posted by: Joelteon7 on 07-28-2007 @ 10:20 - Source: Fleet Operations
This News Item has been viewed 4,198 times
We know that Fleet Ops has, in its various projects, come up with some very interesting designs. With the latest project, they're of course carrying on that trend, but also not forgetting some of the older classes. Like previously done with the Federation Canaveral class, the Excelsior 2 is up for community input (and has already got some, view the source link at the top).
Heyho out there,
As we are still cleaning up the development version we are redoing a few of the old models. One of them is the Excelsior II. But this time we want you to take part in the redesign, too! We once did such a "community design" with the Canaveral Class and we do now want to continue this exiting experience. You will be able to chose which warp nacelles to put on her! But first some general pictures of the new design.
Its your choice!
Just so you understand, the first picture attached is a general shot of the Excelsior 2. The second and third are displays of the Type A Warp nacelle, whilst the fourth and fifth display the possible Type B nacelle. The choice is up to you.
Personally, I get the striking resemblance of the Sovereign. Granted the Sovereign was partially designed off the Excelsior, but I'm getting a large hint from it here. Not that that is bad, of course, but it should certainly make for a fun finished design, but, for it to be finished, you need to help make the decision.
07-28-2007 @ 11:11 - Halo: Forerunner mod
07-27-2007 @ 19:37 - FileFront Network Insider #102
The following comments are owned by the user that posted them. Armada 2 Files is not responsible for their content.
Total comments: 13 | Last comment: 08-12-2007 at 03:00
Joined: April 8th, 2006
|I think that type-B are instresting but a little to pointed so I think type-A are better |
Joined: April 21st, 2006
|I agree with HMS, type B are a little too pointed for the circular saucer. maybe if the saucer more resembled the sovereign's it could work, but then it wouldnt really be the Excelsior. So type A, being that seem to more resemble the excelsior style nacelles. |
Joined: June 17th, 2004
|To the FleetOps Team (I trust they shall read this) - Could you not simply have a standard Excelsior Class? Or if required, an Exceslior Refit (Enterprise-B / Lakota)? Why do you need a 'new model'. |
You've got various old designs in FleetOps already, the Constellation, the K't'inga, if you are going to keep these as you see fit, then I see no reason why you can't include a standard Excelsior model. Why it needs to be a posh refit I do not know.
Joined: March 19th, 2006
|i think the type a nacelles are better personally. |
Joined: January 22nd, 2005
|I'm going to go with the Type A nacelles. |
Joined: July 26th, 2005
|if flops would just go and finnish that mod instead making public polls if a narcelle is more round or arrow shaped - well, they would use their time so much better. |
Joined: July 31st, 2006
|Very good looking ship you have here, i would say typeB is better looking.. |
Joined: February 24th, 2006
|I like type B |
From: (New South Wales)
Joined: March 17th, 2006
|I'm with Tycoon/Ash here. The Excelsior/II is a great design so why spoil it with a cheap refit that looks like a cheap rip off? |
From: (North Carolina)
Joined: January 17th, 2005
|i agree. personally the lakota is my favorite ship of all time. i would use the older ones. |
Joined: June 27th, 2006
|The Excelsior II has been a part of Fleet Operations since the first version on Armada 2. Unfortunately, the model has remained the same the entire time. This is simply a much-needed update of an old design. |
To address the griping about the lack of Excelsior I's, Fleet Operations takes place after the design would be 100 years old. It's an ancient ship. Sure, we all like it, but it won't and quite simply can't stick around forever. Do you just assume that Starfleet will just keep gushing out resources to keep their aging spaceframes from falling apart and their antiquated technology from becoming obsolete over and over again?
However, someone in Starfleet apparently shared your predilection for it, because the Excelsior's replacement pays homage to the original in a way you'd think would be heartwarming and at the very least welcomed by those who felt a particular connection to the original.
So instead of seeing it as an abomination (which is what you certainly put across), try looking at it as a realistically needed replacement that someone saw fit to make it resemble the original... just to make you happy.
Maybe that will kill all the pessimism.
From: (Toronto, Ontario)
Joined: August 7th, 2007
|I like type A. I don't think sovereign nacel's look good on the excelsior, maybe voyager's would? I liked how the sovereign reverted its shuttle bays to the tail end. when your designing an excelsior for such a prominant project keep in mind you don't want to discrace it. Oberth, Miranda and Excelsior have been around for a long time and still in service hundreds of them. look at the prints and circle the 3 most recognizable features of the excelsior. work on little things. shuttle bays, escape pods, torpedo tubes, phaser strips and are they going to look weird on the saucer, is it going to have the new aft thrusters? I would start with that first |
From: (Toronto, Ontario)
Joined: August 7th, 2007
|by the way that deflector is pretty brutal. looks like voyager's deflector encased enterprise d and crushed lol. |
When posting comments, you must follow these rules:
The high interactivity of this site should be considered a luxury, not a right. If you cannot follow these simple rules, you can and will be warned or banned from the comments, site or the entire network for any period of time.
- No "Yay I got First Post!" posts, no exceptions and no matter what other content the post has!
- No Pornographic Material. Any sexually oriented imagery or links to such content will not be tolerated.
- No Warez or Illegal Software. This includes linking to software, posting about it, and suggesting to get it.
- No Cursing or Swear words. We encourage you to use our comment sections as a forum to debate files, news, etc., but please use proper adjectives to express yourself. We will not tolerate abuse upon another member or author.
- No Attacks / Retaliation of any kind against a member, or group of members.
- Please do not advertise for other sites or forums here.
- Maximum of 3 smileys per regular member.
Now enjoy yourself and behave!